So they would have secure, safe and ready access to detoxification and rehabilitation services, as well as many other necessary quality of life services through informational referral.Īs mayor Breed has unwaveringly stated multiple times, “We need to connect with these people on a human level so that we may offer them hope.”
One of the primary goals of the proposed legislation was to provide a safe harbor for those that suffer from the disease of addiction. The truth of this bill being the direct opposite of one in which there is no pathway to rehabilitation. As though he may not have even read the bill, saying that the proposed services did not provide for any rehabilitation services, which is utterly false. But when it came to legislation to provide for overdose prevention sites, he gave in to the Trump administration’s intimidation and morality based anti-drug user rhetoric as he vetoed the bill and cited falsehoods regarding its content to justify the outright veto. Governor Brown, a political leader, who has long served California through the past several decades, has been historically known to be traditionally progressive. Violations are punishable by up to 20 years in prison, hefty fines and forfeiture of that property used in the criminal activity.” “It is a Federal felony to maintain any location for the purpose of facilitating illicit drug use. He stated in the op-ed piece, emphatically: This means that the Federal Government could at anytime today exercise these same persecutions against cannabis clubs as well, anywhere throughout California.
Just as the current legal standing of cannabis clubs operating legally under California State law, the practice is still illegal under Federal law. Attorney General, Rod Rosenstein made direct threats of property confiscation and incarceration of any individuals and/or organizations who may participate in the life saving program that this legislation would legally condone on a State level.
Previous to Governor Brown’s consideration, the ultra-conservative Trump administration sneaked through a dire warning via a New York Times op-ed piece in which Deputy U.S.
Modesto gospel mission new life program full#
Having the full support of the entire san Francisco Board of Supervisors, District Attorney’s Office, Sheriff Department as well as the San Francisco Public Health Department, the push for the bill’s passage was spearheaded by Mayor Breed, who herself, lost a sister to a fatal intravenous drug overdose.Īs soon as the bill passed the California Assembly and Senate, it was on its way to be finally decided by California Governor Jerry Brown and signed into California State law by his signature.
Modesto gospel mission new life program trial#
That bill, also rejected, was re-introduced, yet again, for a third time to allow no other county in the state other than San Francisco to run three pilot safe injection sites for a trial period of 3 years. The counties included Humboldt, Mendocino, San Francisco, Alameda, Santa Cruz, San Joaquin, Fresno and Los Angeles. It began it’s uphill battle 3 years ago, originally presented as a bill that would allow all 58 counties throughout California to independently run safe injection site programs, also referred to as safe consumption centers.Īfter being rejected outright by both the California Assembly and Senate, these same authors re-introduced the bill, reducing the number of counties to pilot a safe injection site and program from the originally all-inclusive 58 Californian counties to nine counties chosen because of their high rate of intravenous drug addiction. AB 186 – A bill to provide safe injection sites for the intravenous drug using population of San Francisco. San Joaquin Democratic Assembly member, Susan Eggman and Senator Scott Weiner, recently authored legislation championed emphatically by San Francisco Mayor, London Breed.
0 kommentar(er)
